<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WoWWatch: Keeping it simple.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lagwar.com/home/archives/8720/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lagwar.com/home/archives/8720</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarc</title>
		<link>http://lagwar.com/home/archives/8720/comment-page-1#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lagwar.com/home/?p=8720#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>I wonder if they wont do something based on how you allocate your dual specs, or if certain classes get improved stats since they are &quot;pure&quot;.  i
i.e. as a pure class...
if you&#039;re a mage, you spec to the bottom of Fire in one of your 2 specs. this gives you a +5% damage bonus in both specs. 
       as your 2nd spec you go to the bottom of Arcane in your other spec, this gives you a +10% spell haste in both specs. 

so no matter which spec you&#039;re in, as a &quot;pure&quot; dps you&#039;re getting bonuses. Druids, Paladins, etc, wouldnt get bonuses at all. or perhaps they just wouldnt get bonuses this powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they wont do something based on how you allocate your dual specs, or if certain classes get improved stats since they are &#8220;pure&#8221;.  i<br />
i.e. as a pure class&#8230;<br />
if you&#8217;re a mage, you spec to the bottom of Fire in one of your 2 specs. this gives you a +5% damage bonus in both specs.<br />
       as your 2nd spec you go to the bottom of Arcane in your other spec, this gives you a +10% spell haste in both specs. </p>
<p>so no matter which spec you&#8217;re in, as a &#8220;pure&#8221; dps you&#8217;re getting bonuses. Druids, Paladins, etc, wouldnt get bonuses at all. or perhaps they just wouldnt get bonuses this powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://lagwar.com/home/archives/8720/comment-page-1#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lagwar.com/home/?p=8720#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>The way GC describes the &#039;hybrid&#039; it seems that a priest or a warrior is technically the same hybrid as a druid or paladin although in my eyes a class who can fill all 3 roles is slightly different then something that can only do 2.  But the tax will be applied to all hybrids regardless of their variety of roles.

Since every healer has a dps spec and every tank has a dps spec the only pures are the hunters,locks,rogues and mages.   It doesn&#039;t make sense to tax the tanks and healers because it would be a tax to each one anyway so why not just avoid it all together.  However, the dps specs will probably see the tax if its implemented.

I don&#039;t raid too often but when i do i usually tend to see our guilds rogue, lock and mage at the top of the meters with a hunter usually around the top as well.  But top 3 are almost always one of those 3, unless the fight has some weird gimmicks.  

I think players skill does still make a huge difference even if it is simply press these buttons in this order over and over, some people cannot do that efficiently.  Even if a hybrid tax is implemented i am sure there are still gonna be hybrids topping meters if you look, maybe not as often but i highly doubt it will nerf everything into oblivion.  I also expect blizzard to make changes to adjust them appropriately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way GC describes the &#8216;hybrid&#8217; it seems that a priest or a warrior is technically the same hybrid as a druid or paladin although in my eyes a class who can fill all 3 roles is slightly different then something that can only do 2.  But the tax will be applied to all hybrids regardless of their variety of roles.</p>
<p>Since every healer has a dps spec and every tank has a dps spec the only pures are the hunters,locks,rogues and mages.   It doesn&#8217;t make sense to tax the tanks and healers because it would be a tax to each one anyway so why not just avoid it all together.  However, the dps specs will probably see the tax if its implemented.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t raid too often but when i do i usually tend to see our guilds rogue, lock and mage at the top of the meters with a hunter usually around the top as well.  But top 3 are almost always one of those 3, unless the fight has some weird gimmicks.  </p>
<p>I think players skill does still make a huge difference even if it is simply press these buttons in this order over and over, some people cannot do that efficiently.  Even if a hybrid tax is implemented i am sure there are still gonna be hybrids topping meters if you look, maybe not as often but i highly doubt it will nerf everything into oblivion.  I also expect blizzard to make changes to adjust them appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
